Investigation Date: July 12th, 2008 Saturday

Investigators: Mark Sr., Ben, Mark II, Christy, Dave, and Penny

At the time of the investigations the house had no occupants except A.P.I. members. Outside noise consisted of
occasional automobile and aerial traffic. The solar and climate data are listed below.

Solar Activity:
Solar X-Rays: Normal
Geomagnetic Fields: Quiet

Moon Phase:
Waning Gibbous
60% Full

Climate:
The outside temperatures ranged from 80°F to 70°F at the start to finish of the investigation. No precipitation
occurred before or during the investigation. The cloud cover was clear.

Areas Investigated:
-First Floor
-Second Floor
-Outside (Perimeter of House)

Investigation Details:
-Upon arrival to the location on the investigation date, additional interviews were held with the home owner. Our team
was guided though out the house and given the locations of previous paranormal encounters.
-After meeting with the client, A.P.I. set up the equipment and began obtaining base readings at the locations. The
equipment used is as follows:

(2) Sony Mini DV Night Shot Plus Video Camera’s
(1) Sony Mini DV Super Night Shot Plus Video Camera
(4) Sony Infrared Spotlight Attachments
(2) EMF (Electromagnetic Field) Detectors
(2) DVR’s (Digital Voice Recorders)
(2) Digital Camera’s
(3) Black Light Lamps for Infrared Illumination

July 12th Investigation:

-One Mini DV video camera was placed on a tripod on the mantle in the living room aimed at the door leading into the
garage. A flag was tied to the door knob to possibly capture the door knob turning.
-A second Mini DV camera was placed on a tripod in the dining room aimed at the bathroom located at the front door.
-A third Mini DV camera was used upstairs rotating from tripod to mobile useage.

-Digital Voice Recorders were placed in random locations through out the house.

-EMF base reading were taken in each room. The base readings ranged from 0.4 to 0.5 milligauss in each room.
Observed spikes above the base reading:

Masons Room (TV)-    0.9 [Very Low]
Tasyas Bedroom:
 Air Conditioner-   5.1 [Low]
 Computer-           2.3 [Low]
 Alarm Clock-       171 [HIGH]

-A.P.I. members rotated through each room attempting to collect EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena) evidence by
method of asking questions and using provoking techniques.
- Periodically, the audio and video recording devices were left in the house while A.P.I. members were outside.

*A.P.I. members attempted to recreate some of the paranormal claims as stated by the client. The voices heard in the
laundry room were not able to be recreated. One investigator stood outside of the house talking towards the vent
from the laundry room while another investigator stood in the laundry room. No voices were heard by the investigator
in the laundry room.
-At the beginning of the investigation the one of the wireless radios squelched with a female voice that said “Hello?”
The radio transmission could be someone on the same frequency in the surrounding area. All radios were changed to
another frequency after this transmission.
-Our investigator Penny had purchased a brand new flashlight. While upstairs her flashlight completely drained of all
power. The batteries were changed out, but the light still did not function for the rest of the night. This could be an
equipment failure or malfunction, but still not explainable.
-The entire team was in the living room discussing the next phase of the investigation when all of the wireless radios
(4) began squelching and beeping randomly. The battery indicators on the radios displayed “low battery”. This lasted
for approximately 5 minutes. This also could have been an equipment failure, malfunction, or interference with local
radio wave transmissions. The beeps and squelching could not be explained along with the immediate drain on all
four radios batteries.

A.P.I. Assessment of Investigation:

When presenting evidence, our team will not accept anything that might be flawed, tampered, or not genuine.
Whatever is left over that can not be explained could possibly be paranormal.

Our members thoroughly reviewed approximately 20 hours of video and audio footage. We examined the audio for
any sounds or voices that might have been imprinted that was not heard while we were there. We also looked for
moving objects or apparitions on the video. We did not catch anything on video or on the digital voice recorders.  The
flashlight malfunction and the radio transmissions could be a variety of plausible explanations that are not paranormal
related. There were no first hand encounters or experiences of paranormal activity during the investigation.

* We cannot conclude that the Saxon House or the surrounding property has paranormal activity.  Our
assessment is concluded based on supporting evidence or lack there of. There was no evidence that
could be determined to be paranormal during the investigation or the footage obtained.

All of the members of A.P.I. are deeply appreciative of working with Tasya Saxon. We would like to thank Tasya for the
support and giving us this rare opportunity to further our research about paranormal activity.